<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Advanced Search Marketing Comments (SMX)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejunglemap.com/post/114/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejunglemap.com/post/114</link>
	<description>Hippo Internet Marketing Blog : Your Map to the Jungle of Internet Marketing by Hippo Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thejunglemap.com/post/114#comment-20357</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejunglemap.com/post/114#comment-20357</guid>
		<description>In response to these actions by Deckers, some Australian manufacturers
formed the ??ugg???? to fight the corporation&#039;s claim, arguing that
&quot;ugg&quot; is a generic term referring to flat-heeled, pull-on sheepskin
boots. They further argued that Australian manufacturers had been making and
trading this style of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uggboots5815jp.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ugg???????????&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
for decades, including exporting them to the US. One of these manufacturers,
Perth&#039;s Uggs-N-Rugs, appealed to Australian trademark regulators, who in 2006
ruled &quot;ugg&quot; is indeed a generic term and stated that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uggboots5815jp.com/index.php?main_page=index&amp;cPath=14&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;??????ugg???&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&quot;Ugh-boots&quot; should be removed from the trademark register.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to these actions by Deckers, some Australian manufacturers<br />
formed the ??ugg???? to fight the corporation&#8217;s claim, arguing that<br />
&#8220;ugg&#8221; is a generic term referring to flat-heeled, pull-on sheepskin<br />
boots. They further argued that Australian manufacturers had been making and<br />
trading this style of <a href="http://www.uggboots5815jp.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>ugg???????????</strong></a><br />
for decades, including exporting them to the US. One of these manufacturers,<br />
Perth&#8217;s Uggs-N-Rugs, appealed to Australian trademark regulators, who in 2006<br />
ruled &#8220;ugg&#8221; is indeed a generic term and stated that the <a href="http://www.uggboots5815jp.com/index.php?main_page=index&amp;cPath=14" rel="nofollow"><strong>??????ugg???</strong></a><br />
&#8220;Ugh-boots&#8221; should be removed from the trademark register.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

